Clinical validation and assessment of feasibility of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) for monitoring of nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, trametinib, and ruxolitinib.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional sampling. However, the applicability of VAMS must be investigated clinically. Therefore, the feasibility of at-home sampling was investigated for the kinase inhibitors nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, trametinib and ruxolitinib and evaluated regarding the acceptance of at-home microsampling, sample quality of at-home VAMS and incurred sample stability. In addition, clinical validation including three different approaches for serum level predictions was performed. For this purpose, VAMS and reference serum samples were collected simultaneously. Conversion of VAMS to serum concentration was based either on a linear regression model, a hematocrit-dependent formula, or using a correction factor. During the study period 591 VAMS were collected from a total of 59 patients. The percentage of patients who agreed to perform VAMS at home ranged from 50.0 % to 84.6 % depending on the compound. 93.1 % of at-home VAMS were collected correctly. Regarding the drug stability in dried capillary blood, no stability issues were detected between on-site and at-home VAMS. Linear regression showed a strong correlation between VAMS and reference serum concentrations for nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib and ruxolitinib (r 0.9427 - 0.9674) and a moderate correlation for trametinib (r 0.5811). For clinical validation, the acceptance criteria were met for all three approaches for three of the five kinase inhibitors. Predictive performance was not improved by using individual hematocrit instead of population hematocrit and was largely independent of conversion model. In conclusion, VAMS at-home has been shown to be feasible for use in routine clinical care and serum values could be predicted based on the measured VAMS concentration for nilotinib, cabozantinib, and dabrafenib.

A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Ruxolitinib and Posaconazole to Predict CYP3A4-Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Frequently Observed in Graft versus Host Disease Patients.

Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). It is predominantly metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As patients with GvHD have an increased risk of invasive fungal infections, RUX is frequently combined with posaconazole (POS), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Knowledge of RUX exposure under concomitant POS treatment is scarce and recommendations on dose modifications are inconsistent. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to investigate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between POS and RUX. The predicted RUX exposure was compared to observed concentrations in patients with GvHD in the clinical routine. PBPK models for RUX and POS were independently set up using PK-Sim® Version 11. Plasma concentration-time profiles were described successfully and all predicted area under the curve (AUC) values were within 2-fold of the observed values. The increase in RUX exposure was predicted with a DDI ratio of 1.21 (Cmax) and 1.59 (AUC). Standard dosing in patients with GvHD led to higher RUX exposure than expected, suggesting further dose reduction if combined with POS. The developed model can serve as a starting point for further simulations of the implemented DDI and can be extended to further perpetrators of CYP-mediated PK-DDIs or disease-specific physiological changes.

Monitoring of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Serum and Self-Sampled Capillary Blood in Patients with BRAFV600-Mutant Melanoma.

Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAFV600-mutant melanoma often experience dose reductions and treatment discontinuations. Current knowledge about the associations between patient characteristics, adverse events (AE), and exposure is inconclusive. Our study included 27 patients (including 18 patients for micro-sampling). Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure was prospectively analyzed, and the relevant patient characteristics and AE were reported. Their association with the observed concentrations and Bayesian estimates of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib were investigated. Further, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-informed conversion model was developed to derive serum PK parameters from self-sampled capillary blood. Results showed that (hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or toxicity. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with significantly lower trough concentrations of trametinib (p = 0.027) but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. Self-sampling of capillary blood was feasible for use in routine care. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum PK parameters from micro-samples. Findings do not support a general recommendation for monitoring dabrafenib and trametinib but suggest that monitoring can facilitate making decisions about dosage adjustments. To this end, micro-sampling and the newly developed conversion model may be useful for estimating precise PK parameters.

Development and validation of a bioanalytical method for the quantification of axitinib from plasma and capillary blood using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) and on-line solid phase extraction (SPE) LC-MS.

For therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of axitinib, the new volumetric absorption microsampling technology (VAMS™) was applied to obtain capillary blood samples in an ambulatory setting and the results were compared to plasma samples as the gold standard. On-line solid phase extraction (SPE) applying a Turboflow HTLC Cyclone™ 1.0 × 500 mm column was used to reduce costs and working time. For the analytical separation, a Kinetex 2.6 µm C18 100 Å, 100 × 3.0 mm column with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min in gradient mode was utilised. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile, water and formic acid (A: 05:95:0.1 v/v and B: 95:05:0.1 v/v). For the detection, a single-quadrupole MS detector was used. Through the use of on-line SPE technology, it is possible to reach a LLOQ of 0.5 µg/L from a 10 µL capillary blood sample. For lower concentrations, a MS/MS-detector coupled with the same chromatographic system was applied reaching a LLOQ of 0.04 µg/L. This newly developed method was validated with both detectors at different calibration ranges for plasma and capillary blood as matrix. The precision of the within- and between-runs was within a range of 0.6-7.8% and 1.8 - 14% CV, respectively, while the accuracy was within a range of 81.2-115% and 87.7-116%, respectively. A reliable, simple, less personnel-intensive and cost-efficient extraction and analysis LC-MS and LC-MS/MS method could be developed and validated, which is applicable in ambulatory and clinical care.

Comparison of a newly developed high performance liquid chromatography method with diode array detection to a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of cabozantinib, dabrafenib, nilotinib and osimertinib in human serum - Application to therapeutic drug monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a highly selective and sensitive method for the quantification of kinase inhibitors, yet not widely available in clinical routine for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). To provide a more accessible alternative, a high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet/diode array detection (HPLC-UV/DAD) to quantify cabozantinib, dabrafenib, nilotinib and osimertinib, was developed and validated. Results were compared to LC-MS/MS. METHOD: After liquid-liquid-extraction and reconstitution of the residue in 20 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) (pH4.6), acetonitrile and methanol (50:25:25,v/v/v), chromatographic separation was achieved in 20.0 min using a Luna® C18(2)-HST column (100 × 2 mm, 2.5 µm), protected by a C18 guard column (4 × 2 mm) (column temperature: 30 °C, autosampler: 10 °C). Mobile phase A and B consisted of 20 mM KH2PO4 (pH4.9) and acetonitrile (9:1,v/v) and acetonitrile:20 mM KH2PO4 (pH4.9) (7:3,v/v), respectively. Gradient elution was performed at 200 µL/min. Analytes were quantified at 250, 280 and 330 nm, using sorafenib as internal standard. RESULTS: Calibration curves were linear (35-2,000 ng/mL). Method validation assays met requirements by U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Compared to the more sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV/DAD showed a good correlation and a strong positive association (Kendall's tau 0.811¬-0.963, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman-plots revealed 100% (cabozantinib), 98.6% (dabrafenib), 98.6% (nilotinib) and 96.2% (osimertinib) of relative differences inside the limits of agreement. Regulatory agency criteria for sample reanalysis and cross validation were met (±20%-criterion:100% (cabozantinib), 94.3% (dabrafenib), 92% (nilotinib) and 84.6% (osimertinib). CONCLUSION: The developed HPLC-UV/DAD method is "fit-for-TDM" in clinical routine and serves as a genuine alternative to LC-MS/MS.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) for the quantification of ten kinase inhibitors and determination of their in vitro VAMS-to-plasma ratio.

Personalized dosing of kinase inhibitors (KI) might be beneficial in oral anti-cancer therapy to overcome individual pharmacokinetic variability. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has emerged as an attractive alternative compared to conventional invasive sampling methods enabling remote and frequent specimen collection. Therefore, an LC-MS/MS VAMS method was developed and validated to monitor drug exposure of ten KI from 20 µL dried capillary blood. The assay includes the KI cabozantinib, dabrafenib, nilotinib, and osimertinib with a calibration range of 6-1500 ng/mL and afatinib, axitinib, bosutinib, lenvatinib, ruxolitinib and trametinib within a range of 2-500 ng/mL. Using acetonitrile containing isotope labelled internal standards (IS) as solid-liquid extraction solvent, analytes and IS were detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) after electro-spray ionization (ESI) in positive ionization mode after chromatographic separation using a phenyl-hexyl column. The method was validated according to the FDA and EMA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation and in accordance with the guideline of the International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology for dried blood spot-based methods. The calibration model was linear and reproducible for all KI (R2> 0.994). Furthermore, the validation demonstrated that the VAMS method is accurate, precise, and sensitive. The method fulfilled the acceptance criteria for matrix effects, recovery, carry over, selectivity as well as for the haematocrit effect and all substances proved to be stable in dried condition for at least six weeks at room temperature. In vitro experiments using spiked venous blood were conducted to establish a VAMS-to-plasma conversion factor for each analyte for comparison of VAMS and plasma concentrations. The method was successfully used in a real-life setting demonstrating its applicability in clinical routine. VAMS concentrations of afatinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, nilotinib, ruxolitinib and trametinib were assessed in capillary blood samples collected from either trained healthcare professionals or patients at home.

Developing a Nationwide Infrastructure for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Oral Anticancer Drugs: The ON-TARGET Study Protocol.

Exposure-efficacy and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been identified for up to 80% of oral anticancer drugs (OADs). Usually, OADs are administered at fixed doses despite their high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability resulting in large differences in drug exposure. Consequently, a substantial proportion of patients receive a suboptimal dose. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), i.e., dosing based on measured drug concentrations, may be used to improve treatment outcomes. The prospective, multicenter, non-interventional ON-TARGET study (DRKS00025325) aims to investigate the potential of routine TDM to reduce adverse drug reactions in renal cell carcinoma patients receiving axitinib or cabozantinib. Furthermore, the feasibility of using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), a minimally invasive and easy to handle blood sampling technique, for sample collection is examined. During routine visits, blood samples are collected and sent to bioanalytical laboratories. Venous and VAMS blood samples are collected in the first study phase to facilitate home-based capillary blood sampling in the second study phase. Within one week, the drug plasma concentrations are measured, interpreted, and reported back to the physician. Patients report their drug intake and toxicity using PRO-CTCAE-based questionnaires in dedicated diaries. Ultimately, the ON-TARGET study aims to develop a nationwide infrastructure for TDM for oral anticancer drugs.

Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice-a prospective single-center trial.

PURPOSE: Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects. METHODS: 262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Median of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6-99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity.

Simulation-Based Interpretation of Therapeutically Monitored Cabozantinib Plasma Concentration in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma with Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma is an orphan but aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. Cabozantinib (CAB), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has emerged as a new potential treatment. However, no data are available on whether and how CAB can be administered to patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: An liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection method was developed and validated according to the European Medicines Agency and United States Food and Drug Administration guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. The samples were prepared using protein precipitation and online solid-phase extraction. The method was applied to clinical samples of an adrenocortical carcinoma patient receiving CAB treatment (80 mg daily). During the 10 days of observation, the patient received periodic hemodialysis on 7 days. Pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations were performed using Bayesian forecasting according to an existing population PK model for CAB. RESULTS: Based on the PK simulation, a mean plasma trough concentration of 1375 ng/mL [90% prediction interval (PI), 601-2602 ng/mL] in the steady state at a daily dose of 80 mg was expected for CAB. However, an individual simulation involving the measured plasma levels of the patient resulted in a mean trough concentration of 348 ng/mL (90% PI, 278-430 ng/mL). The model based on individual PK parameters estimated accessible plasma levels of 521, 625, and 834 ng/mL by dose adjustment to 100, 120, and 160 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After establishing an liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection method for therapeutic drug monitoring of CAB, our analyses involving a single patient undergoing hemodialysis indicated that higher than expected doses of CAB were required to achieve reasonable plasma concentrations. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring for the evaluation of "new" drugs in patients with renal impairment.

Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background.

The study aimed to investigate possible systematic effects in the basic underlying variability of individual metabolomic data. In this context, the extent of gender- and genotype-dependent differences reflected in the metabolic composition of three tissues in fattening pigs was determined. The 40 pigs belonged to the genotypes PIx(LWxGL) and PIxGL with gilts and boars, respectively. Blood and tissue samples from M. longissimus dorsi and liver were directly taken at the slaughtering plant and directed to GC × GC qMS metabolite analysis. Differences were observed for various metabolite classes like amino acids, fatty acids, sugars, or organic acids. Gender-specific differences were much more pronounced than genotype-related differences, which could be due to the close genetic relation of the fattening pigs. However, the metabolic dimorphism between gilts and boars was found to be genotype-dependent, and vice versa metabolic differences between genotypes were found to be gender-dependent. Most interestingly, integration into metabolic pathways revealed different patterns for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) usage in boars and gilts. We suppose a stronger N-recycling and increased energy metabolism in boars, whereas, in gilts, more N is presumably excreted and remaining carbon skeletons channeled into lipogenesis. Associations of metabolites to meat quality factors confirmed the applicability of metabolomics approaches for a better understanding about the impact of drivers (e.g., gender, age, breed) on physiological processes influencing meat quality. Due to the huge complexity of the drivers-traits-network, the derivation of independent biomarkers for meat quality prediction will hardly be possible.

Development and validation of a sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of ten kinase inhibitors in human serum and plasma.

A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of ten kinase inhibitors (afatinib, axitinib, bosutinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, lenvatinib, nilotinib, osimertinib, ruxolitinib, and trametinib) in human serum and plasma for the application in daily clinical routine has been developed and validated according to the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency validation guidelines for bioanalytical methods. After protein precipitation of plasma samples with acetonitrile, chromatographic separation was performed at ambient temperature using a Waters XBridge® Phenyl 3.5 µm (2.1 × 50 mm) column. The mobile phases consisted of water-methanol (9:1, v/v) with 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate as phase A and methanol-water (9:1, v/v) with 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate as phase B. Gradient elution was applied at a flow rate of 400 µL/min. Analytes were detected and quantified using multiple reaction monitoring in electrospray ionization positive mode. Stable isotopically labeled compounds of each kinase inhibitor were used as internal standards. The acquisition time was 7.0 min per run. All analytes and internal standards eluted within 3.0 min. The calibration curves were linear over the range of 2-500 ng/mL for afatinib, axitinib, bosutinib, lenvatinib, ruxolitinib, and trametinib, and 6-1500 ng/mL for cabozantinib, dabrafenib, nilotinib, and osimertinib (coefficients of correlation ≥ 0.99). Validation assays for accuracy and precision, matrix effect, recovery, carryover, and stability were appropriate according to regulatory agencies. The rapid and sensitive assay ensures high throughput and was successfully applied to monitor concentrations of kinase inhibitors in patients. Graphical abstract.

Objective Response and Prolonged Disease Control of Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma with Cabozantinib.

BACKGROUND: Objective response of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) to mitotane and cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen is only ~20% and early tumor progression is frequent. Previous clinical trials with oral multikinase inhibitors were negative, which has been attributed in part to inadvertent drug interaction with mitotane. Cabozantinib (CABO) is an inhibitor of c-MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, AXL, and RET and approved for advanced kidney cancer, liver carcinoma after previous sorafenib, and medullary thyroid carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of CABO monotherapy in ACC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three referral centers for ACC (Germany, United States). RESULTS: Sixteen patients (13 female) with progressive ACC received CABO after previous mitotane in 15/16 and 3 (median, range 0-8) further systemic treatments. Prior CABO therapy, mitotane was discontinued in all patients. Mitotane plasma concentration was <2 mg/L in 7/16 patients and discontinued >12 months in 6 additional patients before CABO use. In 4/5 cases with available plasma samples, CABO concentration was in the expected steady-state range. Adverse events of grade 1/2 and 3 were observed in 13 and 3 patients, respectively, and consistent with the known safety profile of CABO. Best response was partial response in 3, stable disease in 5, and progressive disease in 8 patients. Median progression-free and overall survival was 16 and 58 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: CABO monotherapy appears to be safe and effective as a monotherapy in advanced ACC after failing prior treatments. Therefore, prospective investigation of CABO in ACC patients is warranted.